![Park Na-rae [Yonhap News Photo]](https://cdn.www.cineplay.co.kr/w900/q75/article-images/2026-01-09/8bb2045f-b87c-494b-bcb5-ef8377b3ffc7.jpg)
The situation of broadcaster Park Na-rae, who has completely halted her broadcasting activities due to the 'manager abuse controversy', has entered a new phase. YouTuber Lee Jin-ho is turning the tide of public opinion by raising allegations of excessive corporate card use and demands for settlement money from the former manager's side.
According to the YouTube channel 'Entertainment Behind President Lee Jin-ho' on the 21st (Korean time), Lee Jin-ho focused on the accountability of Park Na-rae's former managers in a video released on the 20th.
◆ "Two Managers Used 130 Million Won on Corporate Card"
Lee Jin-ho revealed that he obtained key documents, stating that the total amount used on the corporate card by managers A and B over a period of 1 year and 2 months was 130 million won. He claimed that manager A used 77 million won and manager B used 53 million won respectively. This can be interpreted as exceeding necessary business expenses, suggesting that there are financial issues entangled rather than just simple claims of abuse.
◆ "Give Us 500 Million Won" vs "Only Discussing Lawyer Fees"
The truth battle surrounding the settlement money is also fierce. Lee Jin-ho claimed, "On December 5th, there are circumstances where manager S demanded 500 million won in settlement through the representative of the PR company." In response, the former manager's lawyer immediately refuted this. The lawyer explained, "The demand for 500 million won is completely unfounded, and the amount mentioned during the call was misrepresented as related to lawyer consultation fees."

◆ "Cried and Reconciled, But Sued... Park Na-rae Was Wronged"
The decisive turning point for Lee Jin-ho, who initially represented the manager's side, was the 'early morning meeting'. Lee Jin-ho stated, "Park Na-rae and manager A met in the early morning, crying and reconciling, saying 'let's not fight'. Believing this, Park Na-rae issued an apology, but manager A's side overturned this and proceeded with legal action," claiming that Park Na-rae was betrayed in trust. He also questioned the credibility of the 'inappropriate behavior in the backseat of the vehicle' alleged by the manager, stating it was "a one-sided claim without objective evidence."
The conflict between Park Na-rae, who declared a halt to her activities on the 16th, and the former manager's side is now expected to escalate into a fierce legal battle beyond public opinion warfare.



댓글 (0)
댓글 작성
댓글을 작성하려면 로그인이 필요합니다.
로그인하기